The shaping of the notion of "control" in the law on international responsibility by certain international and regional courts
Author zone:
Gentian Zyberi
In:
Military operations and the notion of control under international law
Editor:
The Hague : Asser Press, 2021
Physical description:
p. 281-305
Languages:
English
Abstract:
The notion of control plays an important role within the context of the law on international responsibility in terms of both ascertaining jurisdiction and attribution of responsibility for internationally wrongful acts, including for mass atrocity crimes committed in armed conflict situations. This chapter aims at analysing the use and the shaping of this notion through several landmark decisions issued by selected key international and regional courts. The international courts include the International Court of Justice, the two ad hoc international criminal tribunals, namely the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and the International Criminal Court. From the three regional human rights courts, focus remains on the European Court of Human Rights. The aim is to find out how and to what extent this case law has shaped the notion of control in the law on international responsibility for States and individuals in the context of an armed conflict. Ultimately, this analysis will provide more clarity concerning standards of conduct and related legal obligations incumbent upon those involved in an armed conflict, especially civilian and military leaders, non-State armed groups, and State organs involved in planning and executing military operations
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more