International Committee of the Red Cross Library

  • English
  • Français
  • Home
  • Extended Search
  • Search for recent acquisitions
  • Predefined searches
    • Digitized heritage collection on the First Geneva Convention (1864)
      1949 Geneva Conventions : travaux préparatoires and final records
      1977 Additional Protocols : travaux préparatoires and final records
      Annual reports
      e-books

Authority, legitimacy and military violence : de facto combatant privilege of non-state armed groups through amnesty / Pal Wrange

  • Back to last authority
Save
    • Save

    Please click ob the desired format to save the file

    • PDF
    • Word
    • RTF
Document type:
Chapter
Title:
Authority, legitimacy and military violence : de facto combatant privilege of non-state armed groups through amnesty
Author zone:
Pal Wrange
In:
International humanitarian law and justice : historical and sociological perspectives
Editor:
London ; New York : Routledge, 2019
Physical description:
p. 60-75
Languages:
English
General Note:
Bibliography : p. 73-75
Abstract:
This chapter traces the prehistory, genesis and application of Article 6(5) of the Second Additional Protocol to the 1949 Geneva Conventions (1977) and its implications for the question of right authority. Under international law, a sovereign government has sovereign rights (and obligations) towards her subjects while the relation between belligerents is different: It is one of enmity and equality, regulated by the law of war (or international humanitarian law [IHL] or jus in bello). Rebels can be punished for using force against the sovereign, but soldiers of a belligerent not; they have the ” combatant privilege” to kill other soldiers. In present international law, this right of the sovereign (a right authority) is undermined by certain tendencies in the jus in bello. To the extent that non-state armed groups (NSAGs) can start a war without negative legal consequences and thus acquire belligerent rights, they actually have a de facto authority, or at least they are undermining the state’s exclusive authority. Article 6(5) states that ” [a]t the end of hostilities, the authorities in power shall endeavor to grant the broadest possible amnesty to persons who have participated in the armed conflict…” The many amnesty agreements concluded since, demonstrates an emerging trend towards ” retroactive combatant immunity.” Thus, rebel fighters have a reasonable chance of being provided with the ” combatant privilege,” albeit post factum.
Links:
  • Full text (restricted access : ICRC)
Authors:
Wrange, Pal
Keyword in English:
ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL II
AMNESTY
AMNESTY
NON-STATE ARMED GROUP
RECOGNITION OF STATE OF BELLIGERANCE
NON-INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICT
DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAW
COMBATANT STATUS
Keyword in French:
PROTOCOLE ADDITIONNEL II
AMNISTIE
GROUPE ARME NON ETATIQUE
RECONNAISSANCE DE BELLIGERANCE
CONFLIT ARME NON INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPPEMENT DU DROIT
STATUT DE COMBATTANT
Go to:
  • International humanitarian law and justice : historical and sociological perspectives / ed. by Mats Deland, Mark Klamberg and Pal Wrange

You might be interested in this too

Call numberDisposability / Due date
345.22/992See main document
WEBNot for loan
List
0 entries
  • No entries found
  • Permalink for this page:

Contact details

ICRC Library
International Committee of the Red Cross
Avenue de la Paix 19, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
+41 22 730 20 30
library@icrc.org

Opening hours

Monday - Friday

09:00 - 13:00


until 17:00 by prior appointment only

Quicklinks

https://www.icrc.org/en/library
http://blogs.icrc.org/cross-files/

NetBiblio WebOPAC 4.0.0.211 © Copyright 2009 - 2021 AlCoda GmbH Build Date: 03.07.2019