Exploiting legal thresholds, fault-lines and gaps in the context of remote warfare
Author zone:
Mark Klamberg
In:
Research handbook on remote warfare
Editor:
Cheltenham ; Northampton : E. Elgar, 2017
Physical description:
p. 186-209
Languages:
English
Abstract:
Conflicts increasingly involve action at a distance as opposed to traditional battlefield engagements. Development of new weapons, modern communications and growing economic interdependence between states push national decision-makers to adopt asymmetrical strategies to minimize the exposure to risk of their own forces while their opponents can be easily attacked, and also for the purpose of avoiding attribution and retribution. Since international law is used as a tool for legitimizing state policies, legal thresholds, fault-lines and gaps will be used by states to portray their own actions as legal or at least belonging to a grey area but never illegal. These issues have been brought to the fore not least by increased tensions between the West and Russia. This chapter first introduces means of remote warfare such as computer network attacks, psychological operations, use of irregular and/or nonstate groups, and expulsion of populations. It then discusses how remote warfare may exploit legal thresholds, fault-lines and gaps.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more