On the relationship between the ethics and the law of war : cyber operations and sublethal harm
Host item entries:
Ethics and international affairs, Vol. 31, no. 4, 2017, p. 467-477
Why do we need dialogue between ethical and legal perspectives on norms governing the initiation and conduct of interstate conflict? This essay will examine this question by first critiquing the 2013 Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare, which sought to apply existing legal frameworks that govern international violence to a new form of conflict. While the manual is for the most part ethically commendable, the first half of the essay will highlight several of its ethical shortcomings and will then extract general reasons why international law nevertheless must be informed by ethical analysis. The second part of the essay will affirm the importance of law for ethical analyses of justified responses to the burgeoning phenomenon of sublethal harms. Technological developments have magnified the regularity and effectiveness of these practices, particularly against free societies. Responses to such attacks may include punishments that deter and reform, and may target “indirect participants” such as financial supporters. Determining which responses are ethically justified will require insights gleaned from criminal and tort law.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more