International Committee of the Red Cross Library

  • English
  • Français
  • Home
  • Extended Search
  • Search for recent acquisitions
  • Predefined searches
    • Digitized heritage collection on the First Geneva Convention (1864)
      1949 Geneva Conventions : travaux préparatoires and final records
      1977 Additional Protocols : travaux préparatoires and final records
      Annual reports
      e-books

The phoenix of colonial war : race, the laws of war, and the "horror on the Rhine" / Rotem Giladi

  • Back to last search result
Save
    • Save

    Please click ob the desired format to save the file

    • PDF
    • Word
    • RTF
Document type:
Article
Title:
The phoenix of colonial war : race, the laws of war, and the "horror on the Rhine"
Author zone:
Rotem Giladi
Host item entries:
  • Leiden journal of international law, Vol. 30, no. 4, December 2017, p. 847-875
Languages:
English
Abstract:
The article explores the demise of the ‘colonial war’ category through the employment of French colonial troops, under the 1918 armistice, to occupy the German Rhineland. It traces the prevalence of – and the anxieties underpinning – antebellum doctrine on using ‘Barbarous Forces’ in ‘European’ war. It then records the silence of postbellum scholars on the ‘horror on the Rhine’ – orchestrated allegations of rape framed in racialized terms of humanity and the requirements of the law of civilized warfare. Among possible explanations for this silence, the article follows recent literature that considers this scandal as the embodiment of crises in masculinity, white domination, and European civilization. These crises, like the scandal itself, expressed antebellum jurisprudential anxieties about the capacity – and implications – of black soldiers being ‘drilled white’. They also deprived postbellum lawyers of the vocabulary necessary to address what they signified: breakdown of the laws of war; evident, self-inflicted European barbarity; and the collapse of international law itself, embodied by the Versailles Diktat treating Germany as a colonial ‘object’, as Schmitt lamented. Last, the article traces the resurgence of ‘colonial war’. It reveals how, at the moment of collapse, in the very instrument embodying it, the category found a new life. Article 22(5) of the League of Nations Covenant (the Covenant) reasserted control over the colonial object, furnishing international lawyers with a new vocabulary to address the employment of colonial troops – yet, now, as part of the ‘law of peace’. Reclassified, both rule and category re-emerged, were codified, and institutionalized imperial governance.
Links:
  • Full text : only from ICRC headquarters
Authors:
Giladi, Rotem
Keyword in English:
IHL (INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW)
MILITARY OCCUPATION
1918
COLONIALISM
GERMANY
FRANCE
RACISM
Keyword in French:
DIH
OCCUPATION MILITAIRE
1918
COLONIALISME
ALLEMAGNE
FRANCE
RACISME
Go to:
  • Leiden journal of international law
  • Leiden journal of international law [Vol. 30, no. 4, December 2017]

You might be interested in this too

List
0 entries
  • No entries found
  • Permalink for this page:

Contact details

ICRC Library
International Committee of the Red Cross
Avenue de la Paix 19, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
+41 22 730 20 30
library@icrc.org

Opening hours

Monday - Friday

09:00 - 13:00


until 17:00 by prior appointment only

Quicklinks

https://www.icrc.org/en/library
http://blogs.icrc.org/cross-files/

NetBiblio WebOPAC 4.0.0.211 © Copyright 2009 - 2021 AlCoda GmbH Build Date: 03.07.2019