Is the Yugoslav tribunal guilty of hyper-humanising international humanitarian law ?
The legitimacy of international criminal tribunals
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2017
The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) has found itself under criticism for upsetting the balance between military necessity and humanitarian considerations, and for rendering key IHL rules ambiguous. The Gotovina Trial and Appeal Judgements brought these accusations to a climax. ICTY jurisprudence can influence the process of IHL debate, interpretation, and formation. Is the tribunal guilty of steering IHL away from the legitimate considerations of belligerent conduct? This chapter asserts that the evidence is inconsistent with such a claim.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more