The criminalization and prosecution of attacks against cultural property
Author zone:
Andrea Carcano
In:
War crimes and the conduct of hostilities : challenges to adjudication and investigation
Editor:
Cheltenham ; Northampton : E. Elgar, 2013
Physical description:
p. 78-97
Languages:
English
Abstract:
Andrea Carcano discusses the status of cultural property in the context of international criminal law (ICL). Through an examination of case law and statutory analysis, the author outlines how the statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), the statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), and other ICL instruments have approached cultural property. The author argues that neither the ICTY’s nor the ICC’s statute criminalize attacks against cultural property, but that they criminalize attacks against a range of civilian objects, many of which could fit within the definition of cultural property. The author discusses the ICTY’s and ICC’s practices of prosecuting the destruction of protected objects with discriminatory intent as a crime against humanity. He argues that this approach has the advantage of enabling prosecution of attacks against cultural property in peacetime, but that it also dilutes IHL norms protecting cultural property as part of the cultural heritage of “every people.” Ultimately, the author argues that the trend to criminalize attacks on cultural property in ICL has been conservative and that ICL does not yet provide a comprehensive regime by which to prosecute offences against cultural property. [Summary by students at the University of Toronto, Faculty of Law (IHRP)]
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more