Counter-terrorism strategies in a fragmented international legal order : meeting the challenges
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2013
In a memorandum of 7 February 2007, President Bush clearly spoke of a US conflict with al Qaeda in Afghanistan or elsewhere throughout the world and drew a distinction between that conflict which was outwith the constructs of the Geneva Convention and the separate conflict with the Taliban, acting as the de facto government of Afghanistan, which he acknowledged was defined by the terms of the Geneva Conventions, even though he held that Taliban fighters did not qualify as prisoners of war under Article 4 of the Third Geneva Convention. But how does this bifurcation of conflict fit into the traditional legal construct? Can one have an armed conflict against a transnational terrorist group and if so, what are the applicable rules?
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more