Rightly dividing the domestic jihadist from the enemy combatant in the "war against al-Qaeda" : why it matters in rendition and targeted killings
Jeffrey F. Addicott
Host item entries:
Case Western Reserve journal of international law, Vol. 45, no. 1, 2012, p. 259-302
The confusion associated with comprehending fundamental legal concepts associated with how America conducts the "war on terror" centers around the unwillingness of the U.S. government to properly distinguish al-Qaeda unlawful enemy combatants from domestic jihadi terrorists. If the American government cannot properly differentiate between an enemy combatant and a domestic criminal, it is little wonder that attendant legal positions associated with investigation techniques, targeted killing, arrest, detention, rendition, trial, and interrogation are subject to never-ending debate. While all al-Qaeda unlawful enemy combatants can be labelled as violent jihadists, not all violent jihadists are unlawful enemy combatants. Without a significant about-face in leadership that is willing to discern the basic difference between an unlawful enemy combatant and a domestic criminal, America's reputation will remain under a cloud of suspicion and confusion regarding the legality of our actions associated with two significant areas of critique : rendition and targeted killing vis-à-vis unlawful enemy combatants in the war on terror.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more