These contributions critically assess the place of the nonstate actor in the context of jus post bellum in light of the war on terrorism and the increase in intra-state conflict. In particular, they discuss the philosophical justifications for a jus post bellum, its contents and scope, the limits of the concept as compared to transitional justice and the law of peace, and how jus post bellum might be applied to conflicts in Northern Ireland and Afghanistan.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more