The ILA Use of Force Committee's final report on the definition of armed conflict in international law (August 2010) / International Law Association Committee on the Use of Force
The ILA Use of Force Committee's final report on the definition of armed conflict in international law (August 2010)
Author zone:
International Law Association Committee on the Use of Force
In:
What is war ? : an investigation in the wake of 9/11
Editor:
Leiden ; Boston : M. Nijhoff, 2012
Physical description:
p. 319-367
Languages:
English
Abstract:
In May 2005, the Executive Committee of the International Law Association approved a mandate for the Use of Force Committee to produce a report on the meaning of war or armed conflict in international law. The report was motivated by the United States' position following the attacks of 11 September 2001 that it was involved in a "global war on terror". The U.S. position was contrary to a trend by states attempting to avoid acknowledging involvement in wars or armed conflicts. The Committee was asked to study the evidence in international law and report on how international law defines and distinguishes situations of war and peace. Given that important aspects of international law turn on whether a situation is properly defined as armed conflict, providing a clear understanding of what counts as armed conflict would support the proper functioning of the law in general. Most fundamentally, it would support the proper application of human rights law.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more