Can the 1954 Hague Convention apply to non-state actors ? : a study of Iraq and Libya
Author zone:
Zoë Howe
Host item entries:
Texas international law journal, Vol. 47, no. 2, Spring 2012, p. 403-425
Languages:
English
General Note:
Photocopies
Abstract:
For the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (1954 Hague Convention) to effectively protect cultural property, it must apply to non-state actors in non-international armed conflicts. To achieve this goal, the Hague Convention’s application to non-state actors must be strengthened and clarified. This Note examines the 1954 Hague Convention, focusing particularly on the application of the Convention to non-state actors. Part I outlines the development of laws protecting cultural property. Part II examines the important provisions of the 1954 Hague Convention and its Protocols, while Part III discusses the weaknesses of the Convention. The second half of the Note addresses the application of the Hague Convention to non-state actors, looking particularly at the looting of the Iraqi National Museum and the armed conflict in Libya. Part IV(A) examines whether the United States had a duty to prevent the looting of the National Museum of Iraq. Part IV(B) discusses the legal framework for applying the Hague Convention to non-state actors, and Part IV(C) uses an analysis of the armed conflict in Libya to further explore the implications of extending duties under the Hague Convention to non-state actors.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more