Living in the "new normal" : modern war, non-state actors, and the future of law
Christopher A. Ford
Rethinking the law of armed conflict in an age of terrorism
Lanham [etc.] : Lexington Books, 2012
In many regards, the advent of modern irregular conflict - especially in its specifically counterterrorist (CT) incarnation - has indeed led to some growth in the power in the Executive Branch. But this has not occurred willy-nilly, or without attendant dynamics of bargained adjustment. Indeed, rather than being a process that could be likened to the swing of a pendulum back and forth between extremes, the intra-governmental dynamics of CT war and legality in the United States have looked more like a process of punctuated evolution. Expedient single-branch executive responses to crisis have been to some extent adjusted as the courts and Congress have stepped in - and as successive presidents have taken office - but there has been much more ratification than retrenchements in these respects, and more continuity than change in CT policy since the first phase of the U.S. response after 9/11.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more