The Israeli Supreme Court and the incremental expansion of the scope of discretion under belligerent occupation law
Guy Harpaz and Yuval Shany
Host item entries:
Israel Law Review, Vol. 43, no. 3, 2010, p. 514-550
Photocopies. - Source : https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/2FE146EEDFFC48A785ECBA30E3D5E435/S002122370000087Xa.pdf/israeli_supreme_court_and_the_incremental_expansion_of_the_scope_of_discretion_under_belligerent_occupation_law.pdf (last accessed on 22.06.2020)
On December 29, 2009, the Israeli Supreme Court, sitting as the High Court of Justice, delivered its judgment in Abu Safiya v. The Minister of Defense, annulling an order issued by an Israeli Military Commander, which completely barred Palestinians from travelling on Route 443, a major road in the West Bank. This note criticizes the Abu Safiya judgment as indicative, notwithstanding its specific outcome, of the Supreme Court’s ongoing willingness to expand the ratione materiae and ratione personae of occupation law and to allow the military authorities to protect the interests of Israelis in the West Bank, even at the expense of the stronger rights conferred upon the local Palestinian population by the lex specialis — the laws of belligerent occupation.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more