Current role and relevance of customary international humanitarian law
Author zone:
Djamchid Momtaz
In:
Proceedings of the conference on customary international humanitarian law
Editor:
[Tehran] : [Majd publications], [2009?]
Physical description:
p. 25-33
Languages:
English
Abstract:
Considering the fact that international humanitarian law was the first part of international law to be codified, and accepting the fact that all the rules governing armed conflicts, at least international armed conflicts, are practically subject to multilateral instruments, and finally, if we bear in mind that the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 on IHL have been ratified by all states, yet we have to admit that custom has a significant status in humanitarian law. This status is the result of two phenomena; first, passage of time after the entry into force and ratification of some treaties, here humanitarian law treaties, changes the treaty provisions thereof into customary rules. The first phenomenon will eventually answer this question: "to what extent can one extend the application of treaty obligations to non-party states?" Secondly, in some cases practice of states after the conclusion and the entry into force of a treaty can extend the scope of obligations undertaken by stats party, which eventually leads to completion of the concerned rule - at least through custom.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more