Aggressors' rights : the doctrine of "equality between belligerents" and the legacy of Nuremberg
Author zone:
Michael Mandel
Host item entries:
Leiden journal of international law, Vol. 24, no. 3, 2011, p. 627-650
Languages:
English
General Note:
Photocopies
Abstract:
The moral and legal debate over the separation of jus in bello from jus ad bellum generally assumes that the law of war supports this separation and the concomitant doctrine of ‘equality between belligerents’, also known as the ‘duality’ or the ‘symmetry’ principle. This article examines the Nuremberg-era precedents and legal scholarship, as well as more recent legal and scholarly material, and argues that the general assumption is wrong and that the arguments supporting the radical legal separation of the two jus's are unconvincing.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more