Defining aggression : an opportunity to curtail the criminal activities of non-state actors
Host item entries:
Brooklyn journal of international law, Vol. 36, issue 2, 2011, p. 647-693
Part I of this Note provides a background of the international laws governing conflicts, particularly those relating to Non-State Actors (NSAs). Part II criticizes the current international framework for conflict resolution. Specifically, Part II discusses why international law is too outdated to properly handle modern conflicts and how developments in international criminal law make it the best avenue for enforcing laws against NSAs. Part III focuses on the Rome Statute and particularly the 2010 review. Given that this review amended the Rome Statute to define the crime of aggression, this Note discusses the implications and shortcomings of this amendment. Lastly, Part IV argues that by passing a state-focused definition of aggression, the international community missed a critical opportunity to reign in the illegal activities of NSAs.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more