ASAT-isfaction : customary international law and the regulation of anti-satellite weapons
Author zone:
David A. Koplow
Host item entries:
Michigan journal of international law, Vol. 30, no. 4, Summer 2009, p. 1187-1272
Languages:
English
General Note:
Photocopies
Abstract:
The world has grown increasingly dependent upon satellites for the performance of a wide array of commercial and military functions. At the same time, because of this growing reliance (and hence vulnerability), interest has surged in developing novel systems for attacking a potential enemy's satellites. Anti-satellite technology has been tested by several countries. This article asserts the thesis that customary international law, even in the absence of any new treaty, already provides a legal regime constraining the testing and use in combat of anti-satellite weapons. It analyzes three strands of Customary International Law: first, "general" customary international law, which has long been recognized as an authoritative, albeit complex, source of binding rules; second, the specialized legal regime incorporated into the law of armed conflict, which imposes its own strictures, fully applicable to conventional warfare, but not yet applied extra-terrestrially; and finally, another realm of specialized Customary International Law, the emerging jurisprudence governing international environmental law. The conclusion is that there is already a meaningful Anti-Satellite-control regime, created by Customary International Law even without codification in a new treaty.
By entering this website, you consent to the use of technologies, such as cookies and analytics, to customise content, advertising and provide social media features. This will be used to analyse traffic to the website, allowing us to understand visitor preferences and improving our services. Learn more